I am going to give a unsolicited tip. If you go back in the forum. saving all work by a suspected author. Then print them out all at once. By checking matching syntax,common grammatical errors, consistancy, etc. You can pretty much tell who is who ,but not who they really are. Kind of like a cheating 4th grade english class. Well maybe 8th. As for the karnack trick. Thats anybodys guess. I also eagerly wait the reply.
Now if the Question, Who would waste their time, begins to form in your head..........
(( If you go back in the forum. saving all work by a suspected author. Then print them out all at once. By checking matching syntax,common grammatical errors, consistancy, etc. You can pretty much tell who is who ,but not who they really are. ))
I agree - but it still seems to me to be a guessing game at best. I wasn't sure if Mr. C. was implementing the techniques you describe above to come up with an educated guess ... or whether he had some other knowledge of the alleged connection. I also don't believe it is that difficult for someone, with clever skills and imagination, to post and pretend to be someone else on an anonymous messageboard. (again, implementing those techniques you've described above).
Unsolicited OT comment: Hopefully it's now clearer where I was coming from when I had asked - long ago - about the option of having a 'search' feature on this messageboard ... there was never any ill-intent on my part to collect information for a lawsuit, as was suspected way back when ... it had ONLY to do with the ability TO do what you've now suggested in your reply to me. (i.e. research the archives). Tracking through the messageboard can be a time-consuming and tedious task with as many postings as there are now. (not a complaint).
quote: Originally posted by: Craig Maier "Matthew / Russ, As soon as I became aware that you, Matthew, is in actuality Russ, I could not resist. I just wanted to be sure that the record on this bbs is straight on that issue. "
Craig,
Sorry to disappoint you my friend, but as I have said before, I am not Russ.
As I have said, you can check out Mr. Jones' writing style on the Truth website, it's nothing like mine. And from what I have heard about him, there is another big difference between us, he is much stronger than I am.
But why don't you just walk up to him at the next meeting and ask him yourself if he is "Matthew" on this board. You're a very smart person, I'm sure you'd be able to detect if he was lying to you.
For what it's worth ... given that it's been suggested to (( [check] .... matching syntax,common grammatical errors, consistancy, etc.. You can pretty much tell who is who ,but not who they really are. ))
It's evident [to me at least] that Matthew does not = Russ .... that's pretty much why I had originally asked for verification in the first place.