"This is addressed to the room at large. I will not direct any answers to anyone calling themselves Matthew (a Fundie.)
That's too bad Craig. I am sorry that when someone's view differ from yours, you don't speak to them. That pretty much guarantees that you won't learn much in life, unless of course you already know everything.
I can not speak for Jay, but it should be abundantly clear that I do not accept Jesus as the Messiah.
So you are saying that Father Farrell is wrong, for he said Jesus is Messiah.
Will you permit me to hold this position or is it unacceptable?
Craig, I'm not sure where I ever said anyone wasn't permitted to hold a certain view. You must have me confused with someone else. I don't have that kind of power.
But that is not the issue. The issue is this: What do you Fundies think happens to Jewish Souls after our death?
I don't think Father Farrell answered that question directly. But let's look at it this way: If Father Farrell is correct, and Jesus IS Messiah, and you reject Him, what does that mean for you?
That is the real rub here. Fundies think we go to hell; mainstream Christianity do not take that hard line position. Mainstream Christiandom are willing to allow that it is up to G-d to decide what happens to all souls at the end of our lives depending on how we may have lived that life.
I have never said that it isn't up to God. Of course it is. The only thing I've ever said is what is already said in the NT.
As for the Fundies, it is cut and dry. No matter what you do in life, if you have received JC, you are saved. the soul of an ax murder is worth a lot more than a Jewish soul, if that sould has found JC. If you are a Jew, you go to Hell, even if you lived the life of a saint.
I believe you actually stated that God brings all souls back to Himself, suggesting that the ax murderer will get to Heaven whether he ever repents or not.
Moving on - - - does anyone really and honestly still wonder why I dislike Fundies? I think that they are a bunch of bigoted pinheads in order to justify the teaching of such vitreol.
As Jarrett pointed out, Father Farrell's comments don't differ with anything I've said. So is Father Farrell worthy of being labeled a "Hated Fundie" by you Craig?
And the so called NT scripture be hanged. You can not rely on a document that was not codified until 325 CE. BTW - did you know that there were originally about 75 Gospels? Just a bit of trivia for you. Konstantin had them whittled down to 4. The others are now known as the Gnostic Gospels. Often, they are at odds with the four that you Christians are familiar with. That is why they were chucked. They did not seem useful at that point in history in order to shore up the political power of Konstantin who had just converted to Christianity. Craig
The age of manuscript evidence is quite a bit closer to the source than you think, Craig. But of course, even if there were iron clad proof that the entire NT was written within five years of Jesus resurrection, you still would not believe any of it, isn't that true?
Matthew
P.s.
There is solid evidence that the New Testament is by far the most reliable ancient writing in existence today. There exist today over 24,000 copies (5,000 of them in the original Greek language) of the New Testament (either in whole or in part). This should be compared with the fact that only 7 copies presently exist of Plato's Tetralogies. Homer's Iliad is in second place behind the New Testament among ancient writings with just 643 copies.
quote: Originally posted by: Very Odd Indeed " I find those statistics hard to believe.
46% number is from the recent PBS special on President Bush. I'd have to check their site to see their sources.
Interesting info on Craig's "Fundies":
Washington, Apr. 13—(RNS) A new survey finds the vast majority of U.S. evangelicals view themselves as part of mainstream American society while at the same time believing they have to fight to be heard by mainstream Americans.
The results of the survey, conducted for the PBS television program "Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly" and U.S. News & World Report, were released at a Tuesday news conference.
The wide-ranging survey by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research of Washington, D.C., looked at political, religious and racial diversity among evangelicals as well as their beliefs, values and behavior. Findings reveal a division among evangelicals about the leaders who are often depicted as their representatives as well as whether someone must be "born again" to enter heaven.
But a significant percentage of evangelicals relate a tension between having arrived on the American scene and being a community of Rodney Dangerfields within the larger society.
Three-quarters of all evangelical Christians believe they fit into mainstream American society and exactly the same percentage--75 percent --say they have to fight to get heard by mainstream Americans. "These are folks that perceive themselves to be very much in the modern world--and they are, in fact, very much in the modern world--but they do not see themselves as being of the world," said John Green, a political science professor at the University of Akron who acted as an adviser to the survey.
The national poll of 1,610 respondents was conducted between March 16 and April 4 and had an overall margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.
Researchers found distinctions among evangelicals about leaders such as Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell who are often viewed as their representatives. Just 44 percent of all evangelicals offered a favorable view of Falwell while 54 percent viewed Robertson positively. "They're discerning about their own leadership," said Anna Greenberg, vice president of the research firm that conducted the survey.
The world's most prominent Catholic ranked higher than some evangelical brethren. Pope John Paul II earned a favorable rating from 59 percent of evangelicals.
There also are distinctions on key theological viewpoints. While 48 percent of all evangelicals surveyed think only born-again Christians will go to heaven, 45 percent said they do not believe that. Half of white evangelicals believe that to be the case and fewer black evangelicals--42 percent--think born-again Christians are the only ones who will enter heaven.
"I think it does tend to undermine the notion that evangelicals are dogmatic and intolerant about faith matters," Green told Religion News Service. "The fact that they see salvation as something that's available to people other than themselves ... it does go against the stereotype."
Researchers found that while evangelicals were generally opposed to gay marriage--83 percent--that view did not equate with a universal call for a constitutional amendment banning such unions.
Forty-one percent of evangelicals said an amendment is needed while 52 percent said it was sufficient to prohibit gay marriage by law without changing the Constitution.
Moreover, evangelicals were almost evenly divided over whether gay marriage would provide a litmus test for their vote in an election. Forty-six percent said they would not vote for a candidate who disagrees with them about gay marriage but agrees with them on other issues, while 42 percent said they would vote for such a candidate.
Overall, 63 percent of evangelicals said they would support President Bush in the presidential election while 31 percent favored Democratic candidate John Kerry. Sixty-nine percent of white evangelicals consider themselves to be Republicans or lean Republican while 84 percent of African-American evangelicals call themselves Democrats or lean Democrat.
White evangelicals ranked moral values as their top domestic concern but shared general concerns about the economy with other Americans.
That same group of evangelicals was divided about the direction the country is headed, with 44 percent saying it's going in the right direction and 45 percent saying it's on the wrong track.
But when asked if the country's moral values are headed in the right direction or are "pretty seriously off on the wrong track," 76 percent of white evangelicals and 94 percent of African-American evangelicals said they were on the wrong track.
On foreign policy, white evangelicals ranked a strong military, controlling weapons of mass destruction and fighting terrorism far higher than relief efforts and aiding religious minorities. Greenberg said that demonstrated a disconnect between elite and grass-roots evangelicals.
Twenty percent of African-American evangelicals said helping to improve the standard of living in less developed countries is extremely important, compared to 8 percent of white evangelicals.
Michael Cromartie, director of the Evangelical Studies Project of the Ethics & Public Policy Center, said the overall survey confirms the state of evangelicalism, but he questioned if some of the findings related to theological views are actually those of evangelicals.
"There is a certain point where you are no longer evangelical," he said. "Part of the definition of being an evangelical is its exclusivity of the gospel, and that the way of salvation is through Christ, and when you start saying ... `I believe everybody goes to heaven,' what are you, a liberal Protestant now? What are you?"
The survey results will be included in a four-part series on "American Evangelicals" that will air on "Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly" from April 16 through May 7 and a story in the May 3 edition of U.S. News and World Report magazine.
fyrral - what do you mean - - - so what? That seems to reflect your general approach to things. If it does not effect me (she says to herself) so what? 2 examples.
Meriden road is going to turn into a Sunday parking lot.
Fundies find Jewish spirituality to be inferior compared to their own.
You see, it does not bother her because she is not effected in either of the above cases.
As for the Statistics, they are bogus. The largest Christian denemonation in the USA is Roman Catholicisim at 65 Million members. The next largest is mainstream Protestent which has a bunch of offshoots. This group does not take the fundy position. Some examples are as follows:
Presbyterian, Methodist, Lutheran, Episcopalian. If you want more details Google it.
It is a minority of Christians to believe in their religion that the Jewish religions is spiritually inferior to their own.
I do not know what population percentages have to do with it anyway.
Assume that you are living in Germany in WW2. Most Germans believed in what the Nazi Party stood for - - - the majority of them. Did that fact make their beliefs and actions conscionable?
quote: Originally posted by: Craig Maier "fyrral - what do you mean - - - so what? That seems to reflect your general approach to things. If it does not effect me (she says to herself) so what? 2 examples. Meriden road is going to turn into a Sunday parking lot. Fundies find Jewish spirituality to be inferior compared to their own. You see, it does not bother her because she is not effected in either of the above cases.
Again, I say "so what" in context of your original post regarding what the "fundies" think, and your constant whining crybaby response to that. The issues pertaining to the application and the Agilent site are a different matter that YOU chose to make one and them same.That is shameful and smallminded.You also have the habit of trying in some sophomoric fashion to set the ground rules of any debate here by making some of your smallminded bigoted concerns the central topic, and taking the words of other people like myself and applying them to concepts other than what they were directed at in the first place. This shows either a lack of communication skills, selective hearing, an attempt at spin doctoring or a need for therapy.......or perhaps all of the above.
So long as the "fundies" as you call them do not physically act out whatever prejudice they have, why have such an obsession about them?That was all I was saying when I said "so what".The statement or question stands.I don't agree with them any more than you do, but I'm not ready to burst any blood vessals over it.And I'm certainly not going to inject any feelings I have for or against them into the debate over the application as you have done.
Oh, and by the way, this "her" is a "him". But you knew that, didn't you?
fyrral - I thought that you were a she. Sorry, my mistake. Do not make anything out of it - - - I do not know why I made that assumption.
Anyway, I do not imply a connection between my personal beliefs regarding Evangalical Fundy Christians and the legal implications regarding the CC business. It is just that, for me personally, there is an added dimension to the whole thing. They are as follows:
1. It is going to be located on the street where I live and be capable of dealing with 25,000 worshippers each Sunday. That will make it the larges Church on the East Coast of the United States (go Google it and you shall see). The next closest in Size is in Houston Texas and it will be larger than CC.
2. It is a bigoted group who consider me and members of my own faith to be substandard compared to their own.
It is my personal right to have strong feelings about this even though it has nothing to do with the legality of the situation. As you know can not change those facts and the way that I FEEL about them.
Originally posted by: Craig Maier " It is a bigoted group who consider me and members of my own faith to be substandard compared to their own."
Have they told you that? I don't think there is any evidence of that. That's just an inflamatory statement that serves your purpose. It was pointed out at some point that GPBC has basically the same beliefs as CC and they're only a few miles away from you. Have you suffered at all solely because of their religious beliefs?
It is my personal right to have strong feelings about this even though it has nothing to do with the legality of the situation.
I'm sure everybody has considered the fact that even if Craig and every resident within 20 miles of 140 Green Pond Rd. knew Jesus as the Messiah and loved the fact that CC was coming, it would have no bearing on whether the board should accept or reject the application. The decision will be made based on whether CC complies with existing laws and regulations.
But there is no reason to stop debating religion here or anywhere. If there really is a God, he's certainly worth talking about. But let's not waste time trying to tie this issue to the CC application.
If GPBC believes that to be true, then I find them to be just as repugnant. The huge difference is that they are about 12 miles from here and so I do not particularly care. These guys are gonna be right in our faces here on Meriden Road, and there are going to be a LOT of them.
quote: Originally posted by: Craig Maier "If GPBC believes that to be true, then I find them to be just as repugnant. The huge difference is that they are about 12 miles from here and so I do not particularly care. These guys are gonna be right in our faces here on Meriden Road, and there are going to be a LOT of them."
It's no more than 7 miles from the corner of Meridan & Green Pond Rd. to GPBC. I think they're closer than you think.
And it's possible that they've driven down your road before or rubbed shoulders with you in the supermarket.
If they believe that I am going to hell unless I accept their doctrine, then yes, I do find them repugnant. Maybe somebody from that church should address the question so that we know directly what they believe. Question is do they reject or accept "Replacement Supercessionist Theology?
"If they believe that I am going to hell unless I accept their doctrine, then yes, I do find them repugnant. Maybe somebody from that church should address the question so that we know directly what they believe. Question is do they reject or accept "Replacement Supercessionist Theology?"
Is that the way you feel Craig?
Can we stop at GPBC? Shouldn't we check them all, just to be on the safe side? Maybe you, Craig Maier, should visit each church in Rockaway Township and confront them with your "Replacement Supercessionist Theology" question.
And why stop at just that question? A full questionnaire could be put together to find out if any churches in town cross the line by having "repugnant" and "unacceptable" beliefs.
But why stop at churches? Surely there must be some individual citizens in town who attend no church, but share these repugnant and unacceptable beliefs. The questionnaire should be taken to every household to find out who all these people are.
Any church or person found to be publicly advocating these beliefs should be required to identify themselves, shouldn't they? So maybe they should be required, if so identified, to paint a large red "R" on the front of their building or home so all passing by would know that they have repugnant beliefs. And I'm sure you'd want to be able to identify these people on the street so you could avoid them, Craig. So they'd be required to wear a red "R" on their clothing when they leave their houses.
For sure there are some people in Rockaway Township with repugnant and unacceptable beliefs, and you are right, we better find out who they are.
Anyone who believe in their spiritual superiority compared to the group to which I am a member are sicko's in my book. Mediator would probably have no problems with Hitler and his beliefs. Mediator, you are acting like a real A$$hole. I think that you are a CC Shill. You have dug yourself in deeply not let it stay where it is. You can not get out of the fact that you support religious superiority of some religious beliefs. You are, indeed, the bigot. I am a bigot only in the sense that I hate people who hate me. Now that is a real tough one for people to swallow. I guess I should just say, oh well, they have the right to their beliefs. Well, I guess they do, but I dislike the lot for holding it.
Ok Craig ,on the gender confusion thing, I'll accept that. But I have mentioned before that I happen to be Lisa's brother. Anyway, on the issues at hand, I'm glad that you at least in public, agree that these feelings of your have 0% bearing on the application. As far as how your articulate those feelings in a public forum, I don't believe that in essence, I have suggested to you anything that your own Rabbi has not, probably in private as well as in public in the Daily Record.Frankly, I would take the Jewish perspective on your issue more seriously from a Rabbi than from a member of his temple. I hope you can see the logic in that.So far as oppossing this application on the relevent issues, I'm on your side. But, correct me if I'm wrong, but your zeal on this matter suggests to me that if this Church were only 100 people strong, you may still oppose it based on your feelings.At least that's the impression that I have from your prior posts. See you at the meeting tonight.
Again, sorry about the Gender thing. Somehow I missed your relationship with Lisa or forgot it. There have been about 1000 posts on this board that I have read since it began (in my guestimation). As for the Rabbi's comments, they are just that - - - his opinions and comments. He has just as much right to his opinion as do I. And, by the way, we shared shared Shabbos dinner with him and his lovely family this past Friday night. They invited us over and we enjoyed each others company as always. That might say something about it. As for your question about if cc was just 100 people how would I feel - - - I would not be so concerned about it even though they hold what I believe to be perverse beliefs. It is just when the projected membership (as per my analysis which is correct) will match the population of the town in which I reside, and they all have prejudice as a matter of dogma against me and my ilk, then I have a REAL problem with it.