Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Town Council meeting
Lisa Salberg

Date:
Town Council meeting


Tonight my husband and I attended the town council meeting.  I read a letter to the council outlining the actions of "Voices of Rockaway Twp" and recent events in the media and on this message board.


Present for my entire reading was Rob Jennings from the Daily Record.  There were also 2 other reporters in the room.  One from the Neighbor News, who heard the entire letter,  and the other from the Citizen- she did not hear my entire letter, only the end.


In short I explained that our concerns over the application were based on LAND USE issues, and explained them breifly (you can see them in full on our website).  I expressed concern over the amount of media coverage and the slant some of the media has taken. We stated that it appeared that the PR firm for the applicant appears to be attempting to paint Rockaway Twp as "anti-church" and "anti-Christian"both of which are non exsisting sentiments, and recent articles about Marci Hamilton appeared to be focused on her opinions about the separation between church and state and NOT Land Use  ISSUES, which is the only thing that matters.


I said "RLUIPA is an issue that is part of the matter at hand and must be part of the discussion. Religion is not the issue and does not belong anywhere in the conversation".


I further said " Recently, activity on internet messages boards has accused VORT of everything from “being against the school”, (what school we are not sure), to being “anti-Christian”, which is particularly funny as the majority of the members of VORT are Christian.  We have also been accused of a laundry list of acts, none of which have been remotely truthful."


"To date no member of Christ Church or their PR firm has issued an apology for the lies and hatred being spread by its ‘supporters’.  "


"We oppose an application for the development of environmentally sensitive land, on a rural road, in a small town with limited resources and extreme financial hardship to the community.  Suggestions of anything other are meant to confuse and incite rather than inform and educate.  We stand firm in our opposition and will not be intimidated by lies and attempts to hush our voices"


At the end of the meeting I was followed out by a reporter seeking more information.  I was told by one reporter that a different reporter had ask what she missed, when she told her what I had said she responded by saying "thats not true they(VORT) said they were opposed to an evangenlical christian church, like Billy Grahm,  in Rockaway at the November meeting".  I have never heard such nonsense in my entire life!  I walked up behind her and said " at NO time have we ever said we are against an EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH!". At first she denied she ever said that - then she saw that I was speaking to a person she had just said it to and back peddled.


She claimed my husband or John Jenkins said it.   We said she was mistaken that was never saidby a member of VORT.  I said at Copeland the mic was open for all comments, maybe someone said it but NOT the members of the Voices of Rockaway.


She then said one of "your people harrased me at the planning board meeting, I almost called the police!"  I responded by asking what she meant by "one of MY people?".  She could not respond.  I said wait a minute if you think that every person who opposed this application is "one of MY people" you are wrong.  MANY people oppose the application and many people have had a problem with your stories, they appear one sided, but by no means are these "my people".  She then said she is a "Christian reporter".  I said what does being Christian have to do with being a reporter? - No response.


I suggested if she sat away from the applicants during the planning board meetings at least she would look impartial.  Her response said it ALL "I dont have to look impartial!".


Funny I always thought part of being a journalist was to be an impartial witness and REPORT events.  It is very clear that will not come from the Citizen while this reporter is on the job.  This is a very sad turn of events.


Sincerely,


Lisa Salberg



__________________
Karen

Date:

The only person I remember mentioning Billy Graham is the Rev himself, at one of the early planning board meetings. He compares his concepts to those of Billy Graham.


In fact, it's also in the brochure that was sent to citizens of this township:


"...The Church's beliefs are identical to those of Rev. Villy Graham, the internationally known minister. In fact, Rev. David Ireland, Ph.D., Christ Church's senior pastor, recently served on a 30-member ministerial committee organized by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. The group was convened to investigate the possibility of inviting Dr. Graham to New York City in 2004 for a crusade."



__________________
Ted Doty

Date:


quote:


Originally posted by: Lisa Salberg
"she responded by saying "thats not true they(VORT) said they were opposed to an evangenlical christian church, like Billy Grahm,  in Rockaway at the November meeting".  "


Lisa it's true.  John Jenkins said it during his presentation at the Copeland meeting.  He said "we don't need an evangelical christian church, like Billy Graham's, in Rockaway"


Ted



__________________
karen

Date:

I don't recall hearing it but if it was said that way, I don't see what's wrong with that.


After all, DO we need an evangelical Christian church like Billy Graham's here in Rockaway? We have 14 churches in this area that serve us well.


http://www.billygraham.org/default.asp


On quick review of their website, it appears that there isn't even a church involved--he holds crusades and other public affairs. Maybe I missed it, but I don't see anything about how I can go to one of his services.


I see movies, books, radio and television ministries, magazines...



__________________
RTgoodguy

Date:

So, the media is (at least the Citizen) has been taken to the mat on their one sided reporting...good for you Lisa. We all know what has been going on lately, but it is rare to get them to admitt to slanted/biased reporting.

p.s. - can you post reminder as to the next town council meeting? Thanks!

__________________
To Ted

Date:

Ted,


What I remember John talking about was the Traffic Report. It was a very dry, kinda boring (sorry, John) review of stats and figures. Then Adam talkes about traffic at a MEga Church. Plus, knowing John, I have NEVER heard him use the term Evangelical, nor do I envision him referring to Christians faiths in sub-categories like that.


I hope someone has a recording because I don't believe it at all. I don't doubt that someone said it a open mike.



__________________
town meetings

Date:

hey FYI town council meetings are the 1st and last Tuesday of the month. 


 



__________________
Craig Maier

Date:

I did not notice Rob Jennings coverage of the meeting in the DR this morning.  Did I miss something? 

__________________
To Craig

Date:

Yes, he posted Lisa's statements in today's Rag

__________________
Mark B.

Date:

I really don't care what was said about the religion or type of activity that was discussed.

If indeed any of the presenters said something politcally incorrect it would change the fact that they brought a potentially hazardous change that was underway.

Most people in town were unaware of the possible implications that a campus of like this would present, and I applaude them for bringing it to light.

Without their organization efforts I wonder how far along construction would be.

If you pick apart and examine anyone under a magnifying glass, as the 2 founding families of VORT have been...I am sure a sharp person could spin something negative.

I am disturbed at how much focus is placed on religion here and in the rest of the media. I am disturbed by the rediculous statements and mudslinging by Christ Church's move supporters.

I beleive they tried to stick facts and figures, and stressed this is not based on race or religion.

I believe they are acting the best interests of the vast majority of residents here. These two families didn't just show up and decide to start something in Rockaway....they are long term residents homewoners in the town.

What ever is said about them, the point here is that it is not a quetion of our support for THEM (although I'm grateful for what they have done)....

...it would not change the issue here------which is the proposed mega-church campus on Green Pond Road, and it's:

Scope
Size
Burden
Impact



__________________
Karen

Date:

Hey mark, looks like you were late for work when you posted! I assume you meant "it would NOT change the fact that they brought TO OUR ATTENTION a potentially hazardous change that was underway."

lol, it read like you were saying VORT brought the potentially hazardous change!

Watch out, they'll grab that and spin the hell out of it...

__________________
Craig Maier

Date:

Thanks,  I did not find it on the internet.  So, I guess that I will have to go buy it, unfortunately.

__________________
Karen

Date:

I don't see that on the online version either--wonder what that means?

It's on A16 in the paper version though--

__________________
Fair reporting?

Date:

quote:

Originally posted by: Karen

"I don't see that on the online version either--wonder what that means? It's on A16 in the paper version though--"


Yeah - right next to the obits...Compared to the last article on the front page of the local section AND online...


 


Thanks again, Daily Ragord.



__________________
Mark B.

Date:

Karen....you're correct...a little jammed for time, and not quite enough caffine.

My second paragraph should have read exactly the way Karen's mind read it:

""""If indeed any of the presenters said something politcally incorrect it would NOT change the fact that they brought TO OUR ATTENTION a potentially hazardous change that was underway.""""

(Sorry)


__________________
No paper

Date:

can we have a link to the article?

__________________
Karen

Date:

lol, it's not on the online version...see posts above.

__________________
"enormous"

Date:

2 points for Jennings he finally got one thing 100% right...


"The proposal had generated enormous local opposition"


How can a reasonable person continue with this campain against an entire town. Hey- CC good luck finding a home that fits your needs...better get a new realtor soon.  Try Parsippany or Mt. Olive


Oh speaking of homes... I forgot you already had some of your people VISIT local realitors...and ask questions like "would we have a problem purchasing a home in Rockaway Twp" -- Just because the real estate office is in Mountian Lakes do not think that is where the realitor lives...or that they will not talk about your games.


The project is just too big.  Sorry - and good luck with the property search!



__________________
Karen

Date:

lol I noticed that too--I was wondering, at what point did it move from "significant" to "enormous"?

Maybe it's just to satisfy Rob's hunger for drama.

__________________
journalist, you aren't

Date:


quote:





Originally posted by: Lisa Salberg
"I expressed concern over the amount of media coverage and the slant some of the media has taken. 


I am curious as to why you were complaining to the town council? Are you hoping they will censor the Daily Record?


We stated that it appeared that the PR firm for the applicant appears to be attempting to paint Rockaway Twp as "anti-church" and "anti-Christian"both of which are non exsisting sentiments,


What is your proof that CC has a PR firm doing anything of the sort? The bigoted and intolerant comments by anti-churchers are more than enough proof that there is an anti-Christian bias in RT. No PR firm is needed here.


"RLUIPA is an issue that is part of the matter at hand and must be part of the discussion. Religion is not the issue and does not belong anywhere in the conversation".


It stands to reason that if RLUIPA applies to this situation, then religion is an important facet of the debate.


I further said " Recently, activity on internet messages boards has accused VORT of everything from “being against the school”, (what school we are not sure), to being “anti-Christian”, which is particularly funny as the majority of the members of VORT are Christian.  We have also been accused of a laundry list of acts, none of which have been remotely truthful."


Again, this sounds like whiny complaining. If the assertions about you are not true, what does it matter? When you entered this debate, did you expect everyone to line up, lockstep, behind you and wave their pom poms every time you drop a utter a comment?


To date no member of Christ Church or their PR firm has issued an apology for the lies and hatred being spread by its ‘supporters’.  "


Again, where is your proof? Have you ever asked anyone at CC about this? Have you ever done any research about it? If you have, I'd love to see names and quotes. Sounds like you're trying to cover up the fact that you will not disavow Craig Meier's bigoted comments as being separate from the catechism of VORT.


 "We oppose an application for the development of environmentally sensitive land, on a rural road, in a small town with limited resources and extreme financial hardship to the community. 


Your arguments become more shrill all the time. Is that site the only environmentally sensitive site on Green Pond Road? I see lots of development on that road, what's the story there?


Suggestions of anything other are meant to confuse and incite rather than inform and educate.  We stand firm in our opposition and will not be intimidated by lies and attempts to hush our voices"


How have you been hushed? Sounds like you can't stand the heat of debate and want someone bigger than you to take on the ones you oppose.


As far as your recollection of your conversation with the reporter; I am quite sure she would not post the same transcript of your conversation. You have already proven yourself quite capable of character assassination as you did with Pastor Ireland at the VORT pep rally in November.


 but by no means are these "my people". 


They are "your people" inasmuch as they agree with your viewpoint.


She then said she is a "Christian reporter".  I said what does being Christian have to do with being a reporter? - No response.


Is this exactly the progression of the conversation? Again, I assert that you are recounting only those comments that support the image you want to portray.


"I dont have to look impartial!".


She is right, she doesn't have to look impartial.


Funny I always thought part of being a journalist was to be an impartial witness and REPORT events. 


Gosh, Lisa, in what area are you NOT an expert? You know how pastors should run their churches and how journalists should do their jobs! Every journalist has a bias, it comes from being human. Impartial witnesses are juries and court stenographers. She is reporting the events as she sees them.


It is very clear that will not come from the Citizen while this reporter is on the job.  This is a very sad turn of events. Sincerely, Lisa Salberg"


What is sad is your attempt to discredit someone through your slanted point of view. You can disagree with her opinion but to attack her personally is beyond the pale.


I don't think this is too sad. I am eternally grateful that you are not a journalist.


Signed,


Journalist






__________________
journalist, you aren't

Date:


quote:





Originally posted by: Lisa Salberg
"I expressed concern over the amount of media coverage and the slant some of the media has taken. 


I am curious as to why you were complaining to the town council? Are you hoping they will censor the Daily Record?


We stated that it appeared that the PR firm for the applicant appears to be attempting to paint Rockaway Twp as "anti-church" and "anti-Christian"both of which are non exsisting sentiments,


What is your proof that CC has a PR firm doing anything of the sort? The bigoted and intolerant comments by anti-churchers are more than enough proof that there is an anti-Christian bias in RT. No PR firm is needed here.


"RLUIPA is an issue that is part of the matter at hand and must be part of the discussion. Religion is not the issue and does not belong anywhere in the conversation".


It stands to reason that if RLUIPA applies to this situation, then religion is an important facet of the debate.


I further said " Recently, activity on internet messages boards has accused VORT of everything from “being against the school”, (what school we are not sure), to being “anti-Christian”, which is particularly funny as the majority of the members of VORT are Christian.  We have also been accused of a laundry list of acts, none of which have been remotely truthful."


Again, this sounds like whiny complaining. If the assertions about you are not true, what does it matter? When you entered this debate, did you expect everyone to line up, lockstep, behind you and wave their pom poms every time you drop a utter a comment?


To date no member of Christ Church or their PR firm has issued an apology for the lies and hatred being spread by its ‘supporters’.  "


Again, where is your proof? Have you ever asked anyone at CC about this? Have you ever done any research about it? If you have, I'd love to see names and quotes. Sounds like you're trying to cover up the fact that you will not disavow Craig Meier's bigoted comments as being separate from the catechism of VORT.


 "We oppose an application for the development of environmentally sensitive land, on a rural road, in a small town with limited resources and extreme financial hardship to the community. 


Your arguments become more shrill all the time. Is that site the only environmentally sensitive site on Green Pond Road? I see lots of development on that road, what's the story there?


Suggestions of anything other are meant to confuse and incite rather than inform and educate.  We stand firm in our opposition and will not be intimidated by lies and attempts to hush our voices"


How have you been hushed? Sounds like you can't stand the heat of debate and want someone bigger than you to take on the ones you oppose.


As far as your recollection of your conversation with the reporter; I am quite sure she would not post the same transcript of your conversation. You have already proven yourself quite capable of character assassination as you did with Pastor Ireland at the VORT pep rally in November.


 but by no means are these "my people". 


They are "your people" inasmuch as they agree with your viewpoint.


She then said she is a "Christian reporter".  I said what does being Christian have to do with being a reporter? - No response.


Is this exactly the progression of the conversation? Again, I assert that you are recounting only those comments that support the image you want to portray.


"I dont have to look impartial!".


She is right, she doesn't have to look impartial.


Funny I always thought part of being a journalist was to be an impartial witness and REPORT events. 


Gosh, Lisa, in what area are you NOT an expert? You know how pastors should run their churches and how journalists should do their jobs! Every journalist has a bias, it comes from being human. Impartial witnesses are juries and court stenographers. She is reporting the events as she sees them.


It is very clear that will not come from the Citizen while this reporter is on the job.  This is a very sad turn of events. Sincerely, Lisa Salberg"


What is sad is your attempt to discredit someone through your slanted point of view. You can disagree with her opinion but to attack her personally is beyond the pale.


I don't think this is too sad. I am eternally grateful that you are not a journalist.


Signed,


Journalist






__________________
journalist, you aren't

Date:


quote:





Originally posted by: Lisa Salberg
"I expressed concern over the amount of media coverage and the slant some of the media has taken. 


I am curious as to why you were complaining to the town council? Are you hoping they will censor the Daily Record?


We stated that it appeared that the PR firm for the applicant appears to be attempting to paint Rockaway Twp as "anti-church" and "anti-Christian"both of which are non exsisting sentiments,


What is your proof that CC has a PR firm doing anything of the sort? The bigoted and intolerant comments by anti-churchers are more than enough proof that there is an anti-Christian bias in RT. No PR firm is needed here.


"RLUIPA is an issue that is part of the matter at hand and must be part of the discussion. Religion is not the issue and does not belong anywhere in the conversation".


It stands to reason that if RLUIPA applies to this situation, then religion is an important facet of the debate.


I further said " Recently, activity on internet messages boards has accused VORT of everything from “being against the school”, (what school we are not sure), to being “anti-Christian”, which is particularly funny as the majority of the members of VORT are Christian.  We have also been accused of a laundry list of acts, none of which have been remotely truthful."


Again, this sounds like whiny complaining. If the assertions about you are not true, what does it matter? When you entered this debate, did you expect everyone to line up, lockstep, behind you and wave their pom poms every time you drop a utter a comment?


To date no member of Christ Church or their PR firm has issued an apology for the lies and hatred being spread by its ‘supporters’.  "


Again, where is your proof? Have you ever asked anyone at CC about this? Have you ever done any research about it? If you have, I'd love to see names and quotes. Sounds like you're trying to cover up the fact that you will not disavow Craig Meier's bigoted comments as being separate from the catechism of VORT.


 "We oppose an application for the development of environmentally sensitive land, on a rural road, in a small town with limited resources and extreme financial hardship to the community. 


Your arguments become more shrill all the time. Is that site the only environmentally sensitive site on Green Pond Road? I see lots of development on that road, what's the story there?


Suggestions of anything other are meant to confuse and incite rather than inform and educate.  We stand firm in our opposition and will not be intimidated by lies and attempts to hush our voices"


How have you been hushed? Sounds like you can't stand the heat of debate and want someone bigger than you to take on the ones you oppose.


As far as your recollection of your conversation with the reporter; I am quite sure she would not post the same transcript of your conversation. You have already proven yourself quite capable of character assassination as you did with Pastor Ireland at the VORT pep rally in November.


 but by no means are these "my people". 


They are "your people" inasmuch as they agree with your viewpoint.


She then said she is a "Christian reporter".  I said what does being Christian have to do with being a reporter? - No response.


Is this exactly the progression of the conversation? Again, I assert that you are recounting only those comments that support the image you want to portray.


"I dont have to look impartial!".


She is right, she doesn't have to look impartial.


Funny I always thought part of being a journalist was to be an impartial witness and REPORT events. 


Gosh, Lisa, in what area are you NOT an expert? You know how pastors should run their churches and how journalists should do their jobs! Every journalist has a bias, it comes from being human. Impartial witnesses are juries and court stenographers. She is reporting the events as she sees them.


It is very clear that will not come from the Citizen while this reporter is on the job.  This is a very sad turn of events. Sincerely, Lisa Salberg"


What is sad is your attempt to discredit someone through your slanted point of view. You can disagree with her opinion but to attack her personally is beyond the pale.


I don't think this is too sad. I am eternally grateful that you are not a journalist.


Signed,


Journalist






__________________
Desparation

Date:

Wow, I love the sounds and smells of desparation. CC PR cronie or freaky Citrizen reporter, whichever you are. We can litterally feel your tension over the Internet. We will not be bullied by you or your mudslingers. It's over. You know it and this pathetic act of desparation speaks volumes.


You have lost due to The Stormwater Regs


You have lost due to the Highlands Initiative.


You have lost because Rockaway doesn't like the plan you have presented.


It's over. Scream rant, keep telling yourself these ridiculous posts make sense....it's over. And we all know it.



__________________
wiggy

Date:

OMG! Can you imagine Woodward or Burnstein whining like a baby like this hack of a low level "reporter" is? I can hear it now, "Oh yeah Nixon, if it's not try, why worry" hahah! You hack! From Lisa's and three other's descriptions of last night's "meeting", you got your A$$ handed to you on a silver platter. So like the person above wrote. It's over, and we all know it. Maybe you can get a job writing for the Morris Knolls Eagle. HAHAHAHAH!

__________________
wiggy

Date:

Hi, Claudette

__________________
Matthew

Date:

quote:

Originally posted by: wiggy

"Hi, Claudette"


Sorry dude, that wasn't Claudette.


But then again, you guys haven't correctly identified any anonymous anti-vort poster yet, so go ahead and think it's Claudette.  No reason to spoil your record.


 


Matthew



__________________
wiggy

Date:

Um, OK...feel better? You are freaky.

__________________
Mark B.

Date:

"But then again, you guys haven't correctly identified any anonymous anti-vort poster yet, so go ahead and think it's Claudette.  No reason to spoil your record."

Oh....Matthew...do I sense the frustration growing....isn't it you that used to say
"relax...all I want is a park there...let the planning board do their job and follow the law...now the store is getting busy, so I'll have to go"



__________________
Craig Maier

Date:

The above statement implies that Matthew does know these anonymous posters.  Interesting.

__________________
Matthew

Date:

quote:

Originally posted by: Craig Maier

"The above statement implies that Matthew does know these anonymous posters.  Interesting."


Know them?  Why, we're all sitting here next to each other at our PCs in the PR firm HQ !  LOL!


 


Matthew



__________________
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard