I suspect you will see an article in the Daily Record in the next day or two, Rob Jennings called me earlier today.
I was questioned about this message board and if VORT supported all of the posts here, I advised him VORT did not follow the thoughts and opinions of all who post here. I did advise him that some people have had some rather strong opinions and have voiced them here, both pro and con the applications and many having NOTHING to do with the application.
I was questioned about the strong comments of some here on the board on the topic of religion, I advised Rob that this has nothing to appliation.
He further asked if I had ever spoken with Marcy Hamilton and what I thought of her. I told him that I had not spoke with her but am well aware of her experience and that I thought she could add a great deal of information and knowledge to the converstation.
I was questioned extensively also regarding my opinions expressed on this bbs. I Underscored that all of those expressed by myself regarding religion and tax status of churches are my opinions and mine alone and do not necessarily reflect those of anybody else in RT. What I do not know is how he will "paint the picture."
Snowflack got a bit of a spanking in letters to the editor today; good, he deserved it for a lot of those one-sided silly comments he made the other day!
If Rob isn't fair and equal he should get the same treatment.
Well, it looks to me that Rob Jenning wanted and article to "stir up" the community.
Sorry Craig but I do not feel that a posting on a message board merits an article in a paper. We are all entitled to our opinions and Craig you have made yours public. I can not help but wonder what was hoped to be accomplished with this article. I do think it clearly laid out Craigs opinion and why he holds them, but for those who will only read the headlines... they will walk away with the wrong impression.
If Craig held a postition on the Planning board, town council or other public office, then yes I think his comments would merit such an article. However that is not the case.
I see the questions I was asked about Marcy Hamilton had nothing to do with this article. I can not help but wonder if there is a second article comming or what Robs intentions were with that line of questioning.
I did not get a chance to see yesterdays letters to the editor - can some one sum them up?
Lisa wrote “I see the questions I was asked about Marcy Hamilton had nothing to do with this article. I can not help but wonder if there is a second article coming or what Robs intentions were with that line of questioning”
I think he was baiting you....
Hey.. Lisa...perhaps what you said about Marci didn't give him anything controversial, sensational, titillating , religous or racially biased enough for him to use to his advantage.... didn't add to his angle.
Seems to be what most of the reporting on this subject is about.
It does seem to me a bit odd for them to have writtene an article about what somebody like myself had to say on a bbs. As per your point, I am basically nobody other than a taxpayer. I have no political influence in this town, so who really cares what I think. It is just one man's opinion.
quote: Originally posted by: Karen "Maybe the race card isn't working...on to the next manipulation."
Smarten up folks.....He wants to Divide and Conquer.
Don't take the bait....he has shills out there that want to stir up some way to split the town and let us feed on ach other while the wolf quietly slips into the hen house and takes out a prize hen.
We will loose of we loose our cool.
Stay the course and ignore the banter and repeat: Size Scope Burden Impact and so on, and so on, and so on
