We are certainly concerned about growth. Mega churches grow and grow. That is why they are called mega churches. There was just an article about a mega church that had 800 members in 1986 and has grown to over 20,000 and bought or built a stadium to hold everyone. Remember ireland said that many people come who aren't members so conservatively 5200 is way under the figure that really exists. So growth is an issue and a big one!
My views on why ireland picked RT when most of his members aren't around here also concerns me because as stated by Gadfly "Perhaps his choice of locations is driven more by a desire to have the most number of people within a 60-minute radius and NOT by what's best for his CURRENT congregation!!!" Doesn't that equal growth?? His congregation right now will have to put up with much traffic trying to get to RT, never mind what they will encounter once they get off RT 80 for any of their nightly ministries. Lots of luck trying to get up here at 6:00PM. The same is true for parents who will have to drive their kids back and forth to school.
I am clearly worried about his future intentions. He doesn't help to alleviate any fears. His tactics are those far from what a godly person would do- it's more like something a business man would do. Again, cc = business. What do businesses do?? Grow and make money. 140 will be his "promised land", not for his preachings but for his business.
We have every reason to mistrust ireland's want of 140GPR. We have every reason to not want cc as a neighbor shown by their previous underhanded actions. We have every right to protect our way of life!
If Christ Church were looking to locate in a more densely populated area, as you suggest, they'd have moved east not west. For example there are more people within a 60 mile radius of Manhattan than Rockaway. I didn't check with the US census but I think that's correct.
...OK tED - even ireland does not (currently) have the $100 to $500 million that would be required to build a dream "campus" (his word, not mine) in NYC. Build in RT, and the NYC crowd is still within 45 minutes of the GWB AND you bring in the added bonus of being not too far from most of NJ and small portions of upstate NY and Pennsylvania. Besides, as his own video shows, he's enamored with the image of a cute deer running through the tall grass of his country campus.
Why do you continue to deny that ireland is PLANNING on growing and growing big time? You are either naive or stupid if you truly believe his plan is to spend millions on a 100+ acre campus just to go from 5 services to 2 so he doesn't have to work as hard on Sundays!
If there are no definite plans for growth and expansion of ministries, why hasn't ireland revealed his 5 year plan and his projections of growth?
I'm glad you agree. As I said, he picked the spot as most of us did. The intersection of cost vs. proximity. East would have been closer but more expensive . West would be less expensive but not as convenient...and many of us like seeing deer run through the yard...except when the stop to munch on the flowers.
In terms of the number of services, I absolutely believe he'd like to limit it to two. What priest, rabbi or minister wouldn't prefer less sermons for the same collection dollars?
Also, your last sentence deserves an award. If there are no plans to grow why won't Ireland reveal projections...ummm, that's a tough one but I'll bet you can figure it out yourself
We all heard ireland state at an early planning board meeting that he had growth projections that he didn't want to share (too hard to quantify was his words, I believe).
A DIRECT QUOTE from ireland from a press interview --> "We have definite plans for future ministries. We work with our strategic plan, looking at where we’re going to be in five years and what we want Christ Church to look like."
strategic plan...future ministries...looking ahead five years....These are words for a business man planning to grow his company and NOT a rev. just intent on moving to a bigger location to accomodate his CURRENT flock.
Again, ireland has as he states "definite plans for future ministries", why won't he tell us about this PLANNED GROWTH? He has stated he KNOWS what he wants cc to look like in five years. This sounds to me like GROWTH PROJECTIONS.
Are you so naive to believe that his plan is to just move here and remain stagnant??? Listen to his OWN words and he speaks of of growth!
I don't doubt there is a five year plan. Any responsible organization has one. But several posts on this board have made a quantum leap and assumed a 20 -40% growth rate. Be realistic , not alarmist.
For example, Karen projected a high growth rate based on the past. Just remember that a 100% growth rate is easy if there are only 2 members to begin with...but 10% growth is very difficult when you have 5000.
Fact: When interviewed by a church magazine, ireland claims to plan new future ministries (growth) as part of a strategic five year plan. He is very forthcoming when speaking about his planned future for growth.
Fact: When interviewed by the Rockaway Township planning board, ireland claims growth is hard to quantify and fails to tell them about his strategic five year plan and future PLANNED ministries.
Fact: dOTY sends out pro-CC mailer to all of Rockaway Township (sorry tED - you forgot the people with Boonton POs), but refused to say who paid for the mailing.
Fact: dOTY's continued refusal to state who paid for the mailings leads to the conclusion that he has been "bought and paid for", rendering his opinions on the matter worthless.
So tED - who paid for the mailing?
Did you profit from it...or as people ask Pedro Martinez when he's pitching against the Yankees....Who's your dADDY?
You finally admit to being on the CC payroll. It's very clever how helped by pretending to be opposed to CC and then writing comments, under several pseudonyms that made the anti church contingent look bad...Man, you're a genius!
"You finally admit to being on the CC payroll. It's very clever how helped by pretending to be opposed to CC and then writing comments, under several pseudonyms that made the anti church contingent look bad...Man, you're a genius!"
mR dOTy - do I detect a hint of instigating and a touch of rabble rousing?? That is why yOU were shown the door the last time around...can yOU explain whom this "anti-church" contingent is comprised of??
As for as my (eaglemig) posts, I respond to posts and the subject to which they refer. I've also raised a few topics that were discussed fairly throughly, I think.
"You finally admit to being on the CC payroll. It's very clever how helped by pretending to be opposed to CC and then writing comments, under several pseudonyms that made the anti church contingent look bad...Man, you're a genius!"
Thanks for your concern but I do okay. As for my CC support, my opinion is not for sale (for $150/hr, even). I belive some issues are a matter of principle.
ah, mR dOty, can yOu please answer the question - exactly who are the "anti-church" contingent yOu spoke of?? A very simple question, no?? I for one have not met one "anti-church" resident yet - but I have spoken with over 100 opposers to the re-development plans a certain mega-corporation has before our planning board. I'm waiting...
I'm sorry, I should have been more clear. I use the term "anti-church as short hand for Anti-Christ Church...not Anti-religion. I apologize to those whom I've offended
I'd say "Anti-Christ-Church" is a bit of a stretch as well; I don't know anyone who is against the existence of Christ Church.
How about "anti-project-that's-inappropriate-for-the-site" contingent? That's a bit more accurate. Because regardless of whether it's Christ Church or Lighthouse for the Blind or Dairy Queen headquarters we're against it.
Whether or not CC is an "appropriate" use is a matter of opinion, isn't it? Thus the term you coined would be more of an editorial comment than a description
is the traffict nighmare just an opinion?? Is the digging up of the underground parking lot (that cC forgot to mention to the DEP) just an opinion?? How about the the fact that cC has shown up unprepared to every meeting, consistently drop off last minute changes to plans, and then the rEv cries about us stalling??? Just an opinion??? LOL!!!......
The reason for my clarification is, my opinion doesn't include an opposition to the existence of any church, including Christ Church. And I know everyone I've spoken to about this matter feels the same.
Christ Church, along with every other house of worship I know of, does good things. I have no argument with that.
Unfortunately, in my opinion, the impact of the PROJECT that would be INVOLVED with bringing Christ Church to this site would overshadow any good that this organization could do by moving to this site.
Yes, the "traffic nightmare", as you call it is an opinion. Sworn testimony has revealed that the traffic will flow smoothly and the PB chairman has admitted to past "failures" in working with the state and county.
The impact of the parkng issue is still being (or to be) discussed
The changes to which you refer were ALL requested by the PB. The new downsized plans were submitted a full 3 weeks prior to the next meeting..
The "stall" refers to a PB imposed 3 month delay, the "what is a church?" discussions and the PB refusal to accept the CC offer to pay for a meeting place whn the Board couldn't find one
From the planning board meeting - does anyone remember the exact time for the wait at (was it) Morris Ave?
I believe it was somewhere in the 320 to 350 second range...at least according to the 'expert'...Of course, that's just ONE light...there are more to wait at.
So do you agree that waits approaching 360 seconds (6 minutes) at ONE LIGHT is unreasonable????
Yes who could forget the stunt Lou pulled? I don't think it was 6 minutes though. But even if it was, the problem is that Sceusi forgot to mention the number of North/South cars that would be effected. Everyone in RT knows there is little to no traffic along the GPR corridor on Sunday, until about one O'clock PM. And the timing being discussed was for Sunday uring and post church service.