MORRISTOWN -- A 45-year-old Rockaway Township woman was charged with vehicular homicide today in connection with for a Sept. 7 fatal crash on Green Pond Road that killed another township resident.
In addition to the second degree vehicular homicide charge, McCarroll was also charged with third degree assault by auto, fourth degree assault by auto and second degree endangering the welfare of a child.
Superior Court Judge Salem V. Ahto ordered a bail of $100,000 against the wheelchair-bound Dianne A. McCarroll, who broke both legs in the accident. Her attorney, Peter Gilbreth, said the bail would be posted by Thursday.
Carla Guidice, 39, also of Rockaway Township, was pronounced dead at the accident scene at 10:45 p.m..
Rockaway Township police said Guidice was driving her 2002 Chevrolet Venture north on Green Pond Road shortly before 10 p.m. when McCarroll's southbound 1996 Ford Explorer crossed the center lines and collided head-on with Guidice's minivan.
Guidice's three children were in the car at the time, but survived.
McCarroll initially was charged with driving while intoxicated and reckless driving, according to police. She was driving with her 3-year-old daughter, who also survived the crash.
__________________
This message is posted to the "All Opinions are Welcome, but Sorry no Instigators" Internet Forum. Reproduction of this post on any other website is expressly forbidden without prior permission of the author.
I for one am glad to see that charges were filed. I only hope that their will be no plea bargin permitted. It would be refreshing to see the guilty party admit the crime and do the time.
Lisa
PS - JR I like your new tag line!
__________________
The truth wins out over slick PR and personal attacks.
The Christ Church Plan for the redevelopment of 140 Green Pond Rd is just too big for the area.
She won't admit to her crime, she will blame it on pressure from her job, her family, maybe even her kids, but she will not take the blame. Her attorney will argue she was impaired by her drinking problem and use that as some type of mental deficiency plea. If her attorney was really smart, he would tell her to plead guilty and throw herself on the mercy of the court system. This way she will spare the children from having to relive this tragic event in court and in the newspapers over and over and over again. Of course when was the last time you saw a defendant such as this step up to the plate and take full responsibility for their actions knowing that jail time is in their future? This one will be watched very closely across the country.
Bill, I have no real expectation of her doing the right thing - but it sure would be refreshing to see. The facts in this case are open for the world to see and the details of "why" have no value to me. She was drunk, very drunk and 1 woman is dead, 3 children injured and her own child was placed in harms way due to her lack of judgement and basic common sense. End of story - in my opinion a minimum sentence of 20 years is a good start.
Lisa
__________________
The truth wins out over slick PR and personal attacks.
The Christ Church Plan for the redevelopment of 140 Green Pond Rd is just too big for the area.
McCarroll, who was driving home from her sister's house in Rockaway Township, injured her legs in the accident and spent about five days in the hospital.
Gilbreth would not allow press interviews with his client, but said that dealing with the accident had been difficult for her.
Reference my post from a couple of weeks ago "A similar case"
"Homentosky's blood-alcohol level at the time was about .21 percent when he killed a mother of 3 on Rt 10. Homentosky was found guilty at a 1996 trial of aggravated manslaughter, death by auto, and disorderly persons offenses of simple assault and assault by auto. He was sentenced to 30 years in prison, with 15 years of parole ineligibility. According to state records, Homentosky will first be eligible for parole from state prison on Feb. 28, 2010."
Second degree vehicular homicide, I believe - is a lighter sentence which opens the door for more loopholes. I could be wrong though.
karen wrote: I think many of us have had times where we've wondered if we should drive but figured we were fine, and maybe there but for the grace of God...
Let it be a reminder to all of us--life is too short to take careless chances. It's too easy for a quick trip home to turn into a lifelong tragedy.
Sorry Karen, I have to disagree with you. Her blood alcohol level was tested at .225 and of course, there was a delay (how long???) between the time of the accident and the measurement of her BAL. Who knows how high it was before and at the time of the accident. I am definitely NOT condoning people who "have a few" at a party (My personal limit is one drink during a meal / party when I am driving later on) and then head home, but clearly, casual drinkers do NOT ever approach .225.
From the DR article -->
...To get to three times the legal limit [.24] a woman of average size would have to consume between 10 to 12 beers or glasses or wine in the span of a couple of hours without eating.
__________________
This message is posted to the "All Opinions are Welcome, but Sorry no Instigators" Internet Forum. Reproduction of this post on any other website is expressly forbidden without prior permission of the author.
Don't get me wrong--I think it's a ridiculous amount to drink (then get in the car, pick up your 3 year old and drive)!! And how in the world did the sister allow her to take the baby when she was so obviously drunk!
I'm just saying the whole thing is sad and that many of us have been in a position where we shouldn't have driven and could've been in a similar situation, God forbid. What a waste.