NJ.com - The "All Opinions are Welcome, but Sorry no Instigators" Board

Date: Sun May 16 5:44 AM, 2004

NJ.com

Date: Sun May 16 6:33 AM, 2004

CC is getting the most balanced coverage that money can buy.

Date: Sun May 16 9:38 AM, 2004

2120.2. yesterday...
by ILuvRockaway, 5/16/04 10:35 ET
Re: Please answer these question - if you support CC by RT25yrs, 5/16/04

I posted that I thought this question was posted directed at those in support of the CC application. I would be very interested to hear the answers to the questions above. Please let us know why the plan is GOOD for Rockaway Twp ...and the rest of the questions posted above.

A post was deleted from last night - it was questioning CC supporters to please explain why CC is good for Rock. good for traffic, good for the environment and other items.

Yet this morning the post is deleted... AGAIN - this post was placed up basicly asking the same thing...lets see how long it lasts.

Date: Sun May 16 4:14 PM, 2004

Look at this even handed (NOT) management of a message board!

2108.1.1.1. Lisa/rt25yrs
by RTwilIwin, 5/14/04 20:24 ET
Re: LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD by URaTrip, 5/14/04

Here is my voice. Why is your vort group against the church reworking plans to help the environment?I thought you would be happy. Is it still just about religion to you even after all this time?

2126. Think.....
by RTwinwill, 5/16/04 10:43 ET

Here is my voice. Why is your CC group against the town protecting the environment? I thought you would be happy, as G-d asks us to protect the land. Is it still just about hurting the environment to you even after all this time?

What is the difference between the two posts above? The top one remains on NJ.com the bottom one was removed.

2106. Lets try to repair what vort had done.
by RTwillwin, 5/14/04 0:05 ET

We might as well face it. Vort has made the planning boards job much tougher, with all the bad press.

We must forget that and keep supporting the planning board. Nothing can fix the past. What vort and craig have done is in the past. Now we must move foward with Marci and figure the best way to win this.

2127. Lets try to repair what CC has done
by RTwinwill, 5/16/04 10:45 ET

We might as well face it. CC supporters and CC have made the planning boards job much tougher, with all the bad press.

We must forget that and keep supporting the planning board. Nothing can fix the past. What CC, their supporters and Russ have done is in the past. Now we must move foward with Marci and figure the best way to win this.

What is the difference between the two posts above? The top one remains on NJ.com the bottom one was removed.

2128. CC adds people to their team...
by RTwinwill, 5/16/04 10:48 ET

CC still has some clowns on it. Ronnie Mc Berger the Clown and The Bucket FUND are still on it. The thing is, where is the mime? BTW RTwillwin. CC and its people have called even you a church shill did you know that?

2098.2.1.1. Vorts team
by RTwillwin, 5/14/04 16:18 ET
Re: vort adds more people to their team by rockawaygal, 5/14/04

still has some clowns on it. Crusty and bozo are still on it. The thing is, where is the mime? BTW rockaway girl. Vort people have called even you a church shill did you know that?

What is the difference between the two posts above? The top one remains on NJ.com the bottom one was removed.

2129. spoke up
by RTwinwill, 5/16/04 10:50 ET

The planning board knows all the harm they have done to the town. If CC thinks they can bully the planning board to stop a environmental nightmare and raise are taxes due to a loss of 630K they are way off base. A school would take years to build but may be a reasonable option for the land - however a new corp. resident may be nice too.

2122.1. vort is old news
by speakupnowRT, 5/15/04 22:10 ET
Re: Face the Facts by rockres23yrs, 5/15/04

The planning board knows all the harm they have done to the town. If vort thinks they can bully the planning board to stop a church and raise are taxes for a court fight they are way off base. A school would take years to build and be tied up in court.

What is the difference between the two posts above? The top one remains on NJ.com the bottom one was removed.

2130. MAIN...STREAM thinking
by RTwinwill, 5/16/04 10:58 ET

I guess the best reason to be against CC is that this development will destroy the land, pave over 20 acres of land (you know the rest...).A school for the town would also be good for the land. Most think a company would be a good choice because New environmental regulations at State and Federal levels mandate the protection of the land. While the town may have missed an oppurtunity to purchase the land...the reason has been eliminated - we now have a new Superintendant who will not drop the ball.

NO one believes they just are interested in the land to block the church. It is perfectly legal to build a school now it is worth trying. It is clear CC is looking for some sort of compromise as the attacks have hightened they know they are in danger of an all out loss. So this may never even get to court CC will see the light and pack up and find a suitable location.

2116. REASON FOR CC OR AGAINST
by MainstreetRT, 5/15/04 11:21 ET

I guess the best reason to before CC is that a church will help protect the land.A school for the town would also be good for the land.Most think a company would not be a good choice because the last one dumped on the land. The problem is the town had firdst shot at building a school and buying the land and passed on it. Now some think they just are interested in the land to block the church. Even if it might not be legal to build a school now it is worth trying. It has been writen many places that a compromise might be coming. So this may never even get to court.

What is the difference between the two posts above? The top one remains on NJ.com the bottom one was removed.