Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: rockaway truth


Status: Offline
Posts: 48
Date:
rockaway truth


they must have undpated their website -
look what they are calling this forum

http://www.rockawaytruth.com/links.html

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 244
Date:

Updated just certain things. All the information is 21/2 yrs. old. Look at their traffic study, it seems off in the numbers. Especially the 90 cars that are leaving cc in the a.m. If there isn't a school, why are so many people leaving in the a.m.? Seems Rockaway truth leaves much to be desired.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 350
Date:

Oooooh I am soooo waiting for that "forum" to open....this is gonna be fuuuuuuun.....



__________________
Protect our waters, we all live downstream


Status: Offline
Posts: 181
Date:

Interesting - isn't that the same site that called good RT residents "Enemies of G-d?"

...Their supporters spend the past month playing "I know you are, but what am I" games at nj.con...and then they say to leave your IQ at the door before you come here...

Hey folks - let them have their discussions on their forum. No need to chime in...The fact is, their forum and their website has been dead for the past two years because their cause has almost ZERO support in OUR township....

I can't wait to see them discussing getting their supporters out to a planning board meeting! Perhaps they'll have 3 or even 4????

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 472
Date:

lol the description is very creative! But you gotta figure--who's gonna see it anyway, so let them have a little fun calling us names.

Just shows their level of frustration...

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 181
Date:

The members of "Truth" complain when Mayor Sceusi had a chance to address many hundreds of voters at Copeland two years ago, but yet they plan on (or have) invited him to attend on of THEIR meetings:

"The group also plans to invite Mayor Sceusi to attend a Residents for Truth in Rockaway leadership meeting for the purpose of discussing the church’s move and the critical importance of the church getting a fair and balanced hearing based on constitutional and land use law."

....So then why did they find it improper for a RT official to drop off copies of plans at a VORT meeting? I'm sure they would have received the same courtesy at one of their meetings had they asked!



-- Edited by GadFly at 22:11, 2005-08-11

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard