On first reading of Fred Snowflack's article this morning, I don't really see where he's made any real point.
He's restated what we already know and then in the end questions the township's "moral logic" for standing our ground in the lawsuit. But honestly, I don't understand why he went through the effort to write the article. It's not as though anything interesting or relevant has happened.
Maybe I'm just suffering from pre-coffee brain fog...I'll read it again later lol!
I agree Karen. At first you think he is taking the position that Gene DID lose because of the ordinance, then he backs away from that, saying that no one knows. Then he goes on to support the point that we have been saying all along that we are better off fighting this thing cause we are still collecting $630K per which is far more then any legal expenses will amount to. I agree. I dont know what his point was. I am getting a little angry that he seems to only be publishing letters that are supporting the church's ridiculous contention that Gene lost because of the ordinance. Rumor has it, that Steve is more against the project then Gene ever was. We shall see in upcomming days. I know he got some letters stating something different.
