Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: electioneering and 501 c 3's


Status: Offline
Posts: 549
Date:
electioneering and 501 c 3's


Electioneering,” or participating in an election


campaign on behalf of or in opposition


to any candidate for public office, can


cost a charity its tax exempt status. Despite


the urge to support or oppose those


candidates who have strong positions on


your cause, avoid the temptation. You


might not survive to reap the benefit of


your effort.


Electioneering, however, is absolutely


prohibited. Section 501(c)(3)


of the Code says a charity may “not


participate in, or intervene in (including


the publishing or distributing of statements),


any political campaign on behalf


of (or in opposition to) any candidate


for public office.


 


There is no leeway for an “insub-stantial”


participation in a campaign.


The prohibition covers candidates at


any level of government, federal, state


or local, including executive, legislative,


judicial and other elected positions


such as school board member.


Nonpartisan education is permitted,


as is a nonpartisan voter registration


activity. The IRS has also recognized


that officers of charities, such as ministers


or other religious leaders, may


speak out as individuals in support of


candidates so long as there is no official


involvement of the organization.


Determining what constitutes organizational


participation in a campaign,


however, is not entirely clear


Obviously


an organizational endorsement is not


permitted. Neither is an indirect endorse-


trouble? Wasn’t its purpose to urge


the public to vote against the candi-dates


it ranked as unqualified? (As-sociation


v. Commissioner, 858 F.2d


876, cert. denied by U.S. Supreme


Court, 110 Sup. Ct. 1146.)


The IRS has published a number


of rulings attempting to describe activity


that is permitted nonpartisan


education and that which is prohibited


electioneering. An educational


broadcasting station does not intervene


in a campaign when it provides equal


time for candidates without comment


or endorsement. (Rev. Rul. 74-574.)


 


There is much more to this article - but you get the gist... Mr. Whinestein, you have violated the law as has your client.  I am sure the judge is gonna just LOVE this


 


Voices of Rockaway Twp knows the law very well and thereby has not issued any comment about the candidates.  We do however encourage all resident to VOTE!  LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD!   Our sincere thanks to Gene for his service in the past and congratulations to Steve, we know he has Rockaway twps best interest at heart!


 


sincerely,


Lisa


 


 



__________________
The truth wins out over slick PR and personal attacks. The Christ Church Plan for the redevelopment of 140 Green Pond Rd is just too big for the area.


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Lisa,


You are a very well intentioned woman, and we all appreciate that.  However, sometimes you really crack me up.  Please join the real world before advocating stuff like your last posting.


Electioneering by black churches happens ALL THE TIME!!!  You had never noticed this?  Do you not watch the news shows around election time?  Hmph.


In case you had not noticed, there are two sets of rules in our society.  One formal set of laws applies to the public at large.  The other (which is an informal set of defacto guidelines) applies to minorities.


I will eat my hat in a public square if anybody ever prosecutes a black church for engaging in electioneering.


NEVER GONNA HAPPEN!


Just like the DEP is never gonna get involved in the fray over CC's violation of Environmental law.  NEVER GONNA HAPPEN! 


Sorry.





-- Edited by Rational at 12:00, 2005-06-11

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard