Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Special Adopted Rules DEP


Status: Offline
Posts: 244
Date:
Special Adopted Rules DEP



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION


LAND USE MANAGEMENT


Highlands Water Protection and Planning Act


Special Adopted Rules: N.J.A.C. 7:38


Authorized May 9, 2005 by Bradley M. Campbell, Commissioner


Department of Environmental Protection


 


N.J.A.C. 7:38-13.10 Civil administrative penalty for submitting inaccurate or false


information


(a) The Department may assess a civil administrative penalty pursuant to this section


against each violator who knowingly, recklessly, or negligently makes a false or


inaccurate statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, or


other document filed or required to be maintained under this Act.


(b) Each day, from the day of receipt by the Department of the false or inaccurate


statement, representation, or certification until the day of receipt by the Department of


a written correction by the violator, shall constitute an additional, separate and


distinct violation.


(c) The Department shall assess a civil administrative penalty for violations described in


this section based on the conduct of the violator at the mid-point of the following


ranges, except as adjusted pursuant to (d) below:


1. For each knowing false statement, representation, or certification by the


violator, the civil administrative penalty per act or omission shall be not less than


$5,000 and not more tha n $10,000 per act or omission; and


2. For each reckless or negligent false statement, representation, or certification,


the civil administrative penalty, per act or omission, shall be not less than $1,000


and not more than $2,500 per violation.


(d) The Department may adjust the amount determined pursuant to (c) above to assess a


civil administrative penalty in an amount no greater than the maximum amount nor


less than the minimum amount in the range described in (c) above, on the basis of the


following factors:


1. The compliance history of the violator; with respect to the Highlands Act and


any other statute or regulation that would have prohibited the same type of


conduct had it occurred outside the Highlands Region;


2. The impact the violation had on the environment or any regulatory decisions


made by the Department;


3. The nature, timing and effectiveness of any measures taken by the violator to


mitigate the effects of the violation and/or to formally correct the errant


submission for which the penalty is being assessed;


4. The impact of the violation upon other parties and their property.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:

I hope their is no grandfather clause - this should be the straw that breaks the revs back. Now let's hope the DEP pulls the plug sooner than later - I am tired of the b.s. - our town has taken a black eye from this charlotan for long enough.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 165
Date:

Yep, boy the old Rev would owe them a whole load of dollars. His gaggle of geese would have to start working more than two jobs to pay his fines. Too bad its not grandfathered. I'm sure the DEP wont have the intestinal fortitude to fine them. The same as they are afraid to pull the exemption without a judges order. They are all ----less burocrats.

__________________
Chuck Mueller "JUST SAY NO!"


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

The above adopted rules are great for the environment and those that seek to take advantage of the law.  However, they will have no IMPACT on Ireland.  He is a very special case.   It would not be PC to touch this man in any way, shape or form. Get used to it folks; we are on our own in our battle with this man.  No state governmental agency is going to step in on our behalf and fight against the wishes of a minority owned church.





-- Edited by Rational at 15:54, 2005-05-16

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:

the law is the law - everybody must obey laws. Now, the DEP may use kid glove, but in a court of law a Judge must rule based on certain guidlines. You can bet our lawyers are going to make sure the Judge is aarmed with the real facts - you cannot lie to State Agencies and then say oops...

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Quoting John Q:


"the law is the law - everybody must obey laws."


--------------------------------------------------------


I wish that were the case, but it is not.  The system does not work that way, John. 


Example:


Definition of Affirmitive Action (my very short version):


Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law when it comes to employment hiring practices, except some people are to be considered more equal than others.


The above is not a joke;it is a fact and it IS law. Been upheld by the Supreme Court of the US.


Sorry.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard