Thank you for the lovely comment. I believe in my effort for VORT - The size and scope of the project is too large for Rockaway Township. I perfer to keep my community the way it is. We have a wonderful town .
I believe that you will never get any respect for yourself, if you constantly are belittling others. I have never talked down about you, I dont' understand why you would feel the need to call me small minded. I am only doing what I believe in, whether you agree with me or not.
Kim Jenkins (I am not hiding behind any screen name)
As far as belittling goes, You reap what you sow. Reread vORT comments about CC, me,and other church supporters.
As far as keeping your town as it is, it can't happen. Aside from the platitute "nothing stays the same", you're foolish if you think 140 Greenpond will continue to stay empty whle Agilent pays $631,000.
If we believed winning an argument with you would be in the best interest of Rockaway--or mattered either way--we'd all be arguing with you.
But the quicker learners have already stopped wasting their time.
Some of the rest of us continue to hold out hope, for whatever reason, of having some sort of logical, non-politically-motivated, non-school-board-related discussion with you about the matter at hand: Christ Church's application.
I can be convinced that you guys are right. It's just that your arguments, supositions, and inuendo don't make sense. And you're not holding out in hope of anything. You're just clueless and think yourself as clever or funny.
I suggest that getting a clue regarding the salient point s far more construtive than sharpening the name calling skill
Wow Ted. That's a great statement considering it's from the same guy who calls VORT names. I'll throw it back to you. I suggest that getting a clue, Ted, regarding the salient point is for more constructive that sharpening YOUR name calling skills.
Oh yeah Ted. Back to the salient point. It's traffic and impact. It's not the height of a steeple.
I'll admit that I sometimes give vORT (and followrs) a hard time. But only when provoked. For example exposing Adam's past was a direct response to vORT's distribution of my ethics complaint. Other than that I only ask questions and try to make sense of the crap they throw around
Lets get this straight from the start. When we arrived at Copeland , those complaint papers were already there. We did not distribute them. Someone else, who has something out for you must have done it. We DID NOT.
I was under the impression a school board meeting had taken place there just previously...the paper was sitting on one of the heaters, not on a VORT table--
You can believe me or not, but I've got the only copy I knew existed.
Little did I know, this was but one of several lawsuits you've brought against members of the school board.
Just shows your sour grapes, vindictive attitude.
Adam getting suspended at work did nothing to compromise his credibility; he's working for the betterment of this township. He stands to benefit only as much as the rest of us do; he's as credible now as he was before your big revelation.
And calling the issue "forgery" is an enormous stretch. My financial advisor did the same thing for me--with my blessing, he signed my name for me and saved me time and effort in processing a mundane piece of paperwork that meant nothing. I suppose he would've gotten the same treatment if someone official had witnessed it.
I get it. I supposed to believe that Adams wrongdoing was a good thing but the exercise of my right to file an ethics complaint (no lawsuit) was bad.
Further I'm to believe that Toddavid is capable of controling nj.com (owned by the Star Ledger) but that vORT had no part in getting news of my adverse decision printed in the Press or blocking the publishing of Adams ..."cut and paste" caper.
