Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: just in from nj.con


Status: Offline
Posts: 350
Date:
just in from nj.con






this one is really interesting!!


3459. what did they say???
by MCwatch, 12/27/04 20:55 ET


A representitive from Prof. Planning & Engineering Corp indicated it was not possible to comply with the requests made by the fire department for environmental impact reasons. However they would notgive a specific reason.

Further a representitve for the applicant "erroneously stated the reason there are codes is to keep fire chiefs from placing unreasonable demands on developers". "The Chief advised that codes are nothing more than a history book of previous architectural and engineering failures that have resulted in injury and loss of life to innocent victims in past fires".

A discussion took place regarding the fenced in area in the underground parking area. It was refered to as a "mantrap for firefighters", it was explained that this area was designed as VIP parking. The fire Chief demanded it be removed. During this exchange a rep from CC "uttered his most critical trivialization of the comments presented by the experts of the Rockaway Twp Plannning Board to which the responce was immediate and vociferous resulting in the termination of the meeting". His behavior is described as "incomprehensible measure of arrogance"

This information is taken directly from the november 10, 2004 letter to the planning board from S.A. Maglinoe Associates

A copy of this letter is available from your town offices.



__________________
Protect our waters, we all live downstream


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:

There's that pesky little environmental issue thing again...I guess an "exemption" granted by the DEP on now defunt plans still trumps common sense and logical development! I wonder how the DEP is going to view this entire proccess now that the light of day is revealing more details by the day...What's that I smell??? Me thinks it's a huge block of Swiss cheese stinking up our Township.

Merry Christmas rEV, wHINNY, and associates...

-- Edited by JohnQ at 20:15, 2004-12-27

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Considering the historical arrogance of the applicant, it would not be at all suprising that ire-lands ultimate response to the fire situation will be as follows:


-------------------


If RT's volunteer fire department can not deal with cc's plans as submitted, it is time that RT hired a Professional full time department that can.


-------------------


Would that surprise anyone? 



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:

He could suggest that - the County would then send the rEV packing in a New York jiffy...

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Not so sure that any local governmental entity has the right to send a "church" packing.  My impression is that it is incumbant upon communities to facilitate the needs of churches, whatever they may be.  That is going to be part of the jist of the RLUIPA lawsuit against RT.  Sorry ~


Condemn the Property Now Before it is too Late.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:

On this one I'm sure Rational - I am a veteran Volunteer Fireman with over twenty years of service in Morris County - trust me, the rEV would never be allowed to dictate how Rockaway runs it's fire service...that dog won't hunt! He had better be ready to comply with ALL fire regulations - that is the reality of the situation, and perhaps the root of CC's frustration with RT's fire officials...

__________________
BR


Status: Offline
Posts: 329
Date:

quote:

Originally posted by: Rational

" Condemn the Property Now Before it is too Late."


What's the hurry........at the rate CC is moving with their half baked plans, this will drag out at least another 2 years in front of the planning board before it eventually gets turned down. Add another year or two for the case to get thrown out of court, and Agilent tax revenue will have more than paid for all the trouble they caused with their would-be buyer.


Does anyone know what the evironmental impact would be to tear down that ugly @ss building to make way for the new town fields, picnic grounds and nature trail? If not, we have a few years to figure that out.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

BR


While I agree with your timeline, I do not necessarily agree that it is a forgone conclusion that cc will loose the case.  Remember, the Becket Fund will defend CC for free using the Federal RLUIPA law as its legal basis for action.  Also, part of that body of law provides that the looser of the case must provide recompense for the legal costs of the Plaintiff - - - a most unusual situation in my understanding.  So, no matter what happens ultimately, the Becket Fund wins and ire-land has absolutely nothing to loose.  As a matter of fact, he stands to win the RT lottery. 


I think that some of this stuff with A$$holes biblical basis for 4 tall towers and our towns inteference with this aspect of the application will be an element of the RLUIPA case - - - albeit, just one element.  He will claim that our zoning laws are interfering with his right to free expression of religion because of these things.  But, in reality, it is just a red herring in my view.  The longer that we prolong this thing, the more irelands cash register for damages is clicking upwards.  So, I think that we just have to stop the nonesense now.  JMHO. 



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:

Good point br...plenty of time to figure out the future of 140 GPR...no need to panic anyone...

p.s. - the DEP should review this mess...with the facts being brought foward, it can be almost assured that the spirit of of the "exemption" has been overstepped...instant foul, instant revocation of said "exemption"...Rockaway comes out smelling like a rose...imho...

-- Edited by JohnQ at 22:23, 2004-12-27

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 181
Date:

" think that some of this stuff with A$$holes biblical basis for 4 tall towers and our towns inteference with this aspect of the application will be an element of the RLUIPA case - - - albeit, just one element.  He will claim that our zoning laws are interfering with his right to free expression of religion because of these things.  But, in reality, it is just a red herring in my view.  The longer that we prolong this thing, the more irelands cash register for damages is clicking upwards.  So, I think that we just have to stop the nonesense now.  JMHO. "


Craig Daniel,


At the last pb meeting, Mr. Dimin asked very clear questions to determine if cc ' needed' these multiple towers in their old building.  It was obvious that if they stated, 'yeah, we've got 4 towers now', that Dimin would have backed off.  His point seemed to be "if your religion did not call for multiple towers in your old location, then it is clearly an architectural decision and not a religious need".  I think he made his point very well.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

It's Daniel -


Well anyway, what is to say that ire-lands so called belief system has not evolved?  Just because he did not have these features in his old business does not mean that it has not become a religious requirement in his new one.  Remember, Ireland makes the rules here, friends.  In the future, he could declare anything to be part of his religious rite at any time.  He is not bound by the rules of a "real religion."



-- Edited by Rational at 09:00, 2004-12-28

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Date:

you guys may find this site of interest


http://www.churchexecutive.com/2003/09/Zoned_out_Stand_you_ground.asp


 


http://www.churchexecutive.com



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:

If only the rEV read this part a few years ago:

"A church needs to make sure the entire site has been master planned before it invests in construction documents. Hankins says that too many times, churches request an architect to draw plans for a building that cannot be built. He suggests that the church should have the architect master plan the site and resolve all the zoning issues during the master planning and schematic design phase before moving forward with the expense of working drawings.

A church should not begin any design workwithout securing a boundary and topographical survey. According to Hankins, some churches do not want to spend a few thousand dollars for a good boundary and topographical survey, but end up spending tens of thousands of dollars for drawings of a building that won't fit on their property."



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 549
Date:

I found this passage very interesting:



  1. Check the local zoning code (or codes) when you are looking for property.

    It is better to be in a zone where churches are permitted by right than in a zone where you need to obtain conditional use approval from a zoning board.

    If you are in a zone as a permitted use by right without prior approval, any future accessory or secondary uses of the building will be better protected.


  2. Watch out for changes in the local zoning code.

    If you are in a permitted-by-right zone and that zone changes, your present uses will be "grandfathered" in, but future accessory uses might become more difficult.

    Become politically active and aware where zoning laws are concerned.


This entire article as very interesting.  I do think it a bit strange that the author suggests meeting with town officials one on one and buying them lunch - that seems potentially unethical in some cases.


Happy New Year to all!


Lisa


 



__________________
The truth wins out over slick PR and personal attacks. The Christ Church Plan for the redevelopment of 140 Green Pond Rd is just too big for the area.


Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Date:

Lisa, John & all,


That site & that magazine is very popular among mega administrators. you may find some more things of interest on the site...search "parking" "evironment" pollution" traffic" etc


Of particular note is the emphasis on "good relations with the community"... not all megas are like cc... many are on very good terms with the neighbors & the community...like everything else its only cases like this that make the press


happy new year



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 549
Date:

This was found on the same site as noted above:


To accommodate growth (current membership is around 9,500), NHCF has had to increase the number of weekend services at the local high school and, for overflow services, obtain an outdoor tent structure (which seats an additional 750 people) and a 27-foot by 36-foot viewing screen.

Ahu says NHCF has considered building a new worship facility, but, at roughly $100 per square foot, land in Oahu is cost prohibitive. "To build an entire facility with sufficient parking we would need around $80 million," Ahu says, "and right now we want to keep our focus on ministry."


****************


Take a look at your church décor. Is it consistent with your overall brand? Does it enhance and emphasize your overall message? It should. Whether you want to admit it or not, your lobby furniture is communicating to your guests even before they sit down for a worship service.


 


*************************


On September 12, 2004, thousands of people from the city of Woodstock, GA, and elsewhere witnessed the grand opening of a colossal construction project built at a budget of $64 million. It's the First Baptist Church of Woodstock's new worship center, a 185-foot-tall, fan-shaped building that has seats for 7,500 people and parking space for 4,700 cars. The span of the structure from side to side is over 300 feet. Two escalators move people quickly from one level to another. Circular corridors on two floors, like those seen in stadiums, wrap the worship area. Children walk safely across a bridge that connects to a parking lot.


(do the math that is 1.66 people per car)


 


****************


 


The point of my posting: How big can a Mega Church get - in reality.  All you need do is look above.


 


Lisa



 



__________________
The truth wins out over slick PR and personal attacks. The Christ Church Plan for the redevelopment of 140 Green Pond Rd is just too big for the area.


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Lisa,


As was pointed out in one meeting by the good revs mouthpiece, Berger, if cc achieved Gigachurch size, that is totally irrelevent to the application.  Gigachurches are defined as those that can accomodate 20,000 or more.  And that is what our good reverend is planning on here in RT as you should know.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 549
Date:

The reference above is a "church exec." publication.  Many people have opinions as to what the growth may be, some may be right on target, others too low or too high. The quotes above are simply a true world account of what IS.


Nothing more nothing less.



__________________
The truth wins out over slick PR and personal attacks. The Christ Church Plan for the redevelopment of 140 Green Pond Rd is just too big for the area.


Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Date:

with 5000 people GPR, Meridan & old Beach Glen will be a complete nightmare... with 10,000 plus which is the growth figure... forget it... there will have to be major road renovations


 


 


http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2002/141/31.0.html



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Nobody builds a 400,000 square foot church facility for 5000 members.  Why does anyone on this venue even think of using that number??  The Right number is 20,000 or more.  That is precisely what this man is building for.  And yes, it will totally destroy the roads mentioned on Sundays.  Anyone who owns real estate on the mentioned roads may as well just abandon their property, 'cause they will ultimately become unsellable if this monstrosity gets built.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Date:

Daniel... I think we all know the 5000 # is useless... The 30 million+ price tag alone tells us all they KNOW they have to grow significantly larger VERY quickly... more presumption than faith on their part if you ask me


I have been to many megas & even much smaller ones have a much better logistical situation than 140 GPR... I was at one that was 1/4 mile from the interstate & on a 4 lane road (similar to Damons location), which people accessed from both directions and neighbors were protesting that (and the church had been there for years and there were roads you could use to go around it)


even if they stay at 5000 it will be a bad situation... at 10,000-20,000 GPR will be like the cross bronx expressway...shuttle  buses & cars parked wherever they can will become common place...(they know 1 spot per 3 people is the law, but they need 1 spot per 2 people... I think they are hoping they can add another 500-1000 spots after they move in)...people cutting through the side streets will be a safety isssue (and they will accuse the cops of picking on them)


 It seems impossible that they will be able to protect the environment with this large of a plan.


If they come, everything they do will be a fight


It's a shame RT didn't take the property...we really need it & could have paid for it in a matter of years


 


happy new year!



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:

Good point - with all the new construction going up at the mall, we really could have offset the 14 million price tag with ease...I wonder what the real reasons were for turning a blind eye to the site before all this mess happend???

I firmly believe that once this CC mess is over, Rockaway Township should move on that property - it would be a slam dunk sell with us voters...

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

A tangential concept to keep in mind regarding all of this is the solid foundation of law on which Eminent Domain is constructed.  In other words, according to one of my lawyers, it is almost impossible for a Plaintiff to succeed in an action against a township (etc.) after that entity exercises condemnation / eminent domain.  Besides, the township does not have to offer 14 Megs just because Ireland has offered that.  We can offer 7 Megs and let them fight us in court.  They will in the highest of probability, loose the battle.  Thereafter, this township is in a position to heal itself and move on.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:

I am sure the eminent domain is in the back pocket...it would behove us to use this as a last resort - the DEP was lied to, they will have to re-visit the "exemption" with the real facts in hand, and if they do the honest thing, Rockaway will not have to suffer the bogus lawsuit by the rEV...

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

The DEP will do the Politically Correct thing.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 350
Date:




3474. famous quotes in RT history
by russstfunow, 1/1/05 21:06 ET

Neighbor News December 29, 2004

"Mr. Dimin was his mean old self but why didnt they mention the angry, cantankerous, puffed-up RT Fireman guy...and how the mayor played to his vort constituency with questions that rival Inspector stall stall stall Closeau who reemeraged as his old self in these proceedings duly representing the aforementioned vorties by asking a litany of fumbling , bumbling questions that went no where but waste more time which is part of his job of description - it's a good thing he can get paid for work like this because when a judge gets to hear this drivel, the gavel will come down and this guy will be in the restroom on his cellphone trying to find another easy planning board gig."

Can you guess who said this?


*********************


How funny is this post!


 



__________________
Protect our waters, we all live downstream
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard