Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Well, That Didn't Take Long At All!


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:
Well, That Didn't Take Long At All!


The Freeholders folded like a cheap camera, just like RT, the PB and the DEP. I guess Christ Corporation really does have a direct connection with G-d! Here it is folks:

http://www.dailyrecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071011/COMMUNITIES43/710110349


Time to get out of Dodge is long overdue. Too bad nobody is looking right now.

-- Edited by Rational at 14:21, 2007-10-11

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 259
Date:


I was wondering if the Freeholders also approved the turning lane and whether anyone has a problem that this lane is within spitting distance of a C-1 stream. Does anyone have any information concerning that?



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

I can tell you that there were surveyors out there yesterday mapping the land between Green Pond Road and the stream. It would appear that nobody give a $hit about the stream and its environmental health - - - obviously, the DEP does not care, so why should the Freeholders or anybody else care?

But here is a question that I have:

What business does RT have in donating property to Christ Corporation so that they can build a turning lane? I find that to be very offensive. Nobody is giving the Jewish Shul that I am a member of free property. As a Jew, I am being forced to financially support a toy church that I do not believe in. I think that is a violation of my Constitutional rights.

But - if we are going to ignore the US Constitution, then ~

I think that if RT is going to donate land to CC for its betterment, I want some land donated to my Shul too. I also think that the other real churches in town also should get some free land from RT. Is anybody with me on that, or am I a lone voice on this matter of land donation to a church by a municipality?

-- Edited by Rational at 13:09, 2007-10-12

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

Rat,

You might be surprised to know that BOTH Temples in Rockaway Township had land that was partially donated by the Township. Do a search and you'll notice it in the chain of ownership to both properties.


MrBill

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

OH, NO, - - - It's Mr Bill,

Quite frankly, I think that you are full of $hit. Please state for all of us the former block and lot numbers that were donated by RT to the Temples. Please shows us the links that will enlighten us on this matter.

OH NO!!!

But just lets us assume that RT did donate land to the Temples. I would say that the Township had no business doing that and probably violated the US constitution in doing so. The Government is not supposed to be providing financial support to religion in this country. Your tax dollars are NOT to be spent on religious orgainizations. If you are an advocate for that kind of theocratic system, please move to Iran.

Thankx,

Rat

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

Rat,

As for the original Temple in Rockaway Township, you'll be extremely surprised what the title chain shows, very surprised indeed. As for the secondary shule, better check the back portion of the property along with the original corner parcel it's entrance is now allocated. Feel free to stop by the hall of records in Morristown where the original deeds and past titles are located. When you are done, I'll expect a very public apology from you. Time for you to stop playing the armchair quarterback and get off your fat assets and do some of your own homework for a change.

Mr Bill

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Mr Bill,

You really are a knuckelhead who has not even learned how to read for comprehension.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quoting Myself from the previous posting:

"But just lets assume that RT did donate land to the Temples. I would say that the Township had no business doing that and probably violated the US constitution in doing so. The Government is not supposed to be providing financial support to religion in this country. Your tax dollars are NOT to be spent on religious orgainizations. If you are an advocate for that kind of theocratic system, please move to Iran."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, besides the point that I made above (which you may not understand because I used words with more than four letters therein) I would say that the onus is upon you to prove your assertion; it is not my task to disprove you. Please send me a copy of the documentation to back up your claims. Send it to the following fax number:

973-316-5098

I will digitize it and post it here for everyone to see. In the meantime, please spend an hour or two reading the above highlighted portion of my statement about theocracies and see if you can possibly understand the problem with state sponsered religion. Give us a report on your ultimate understanding of why this sort of thing is not promulagated in our representative republic style of government.

And so answer this question:

Are you in favor of the concept of RT supporting Christ's Corporation with our various township assets? And, do not DODGE.

What an embarassement you are. Luckily, you doubtless are not in any sort of position in life to do any real damage to anyone.

Rat





-- Edited by Rational at 23:40, 2007-10-12

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

Rat,

I do not agree, since you are the one picking the bone of contention that what I posted is not so, then it is up to you and your manic depressive personality to rise of your behind, drive down to the hall of records in Morristown, and spend the time to look up what I already know to be fact (allow me to spell it a little slower for you F-A-C-T), and not a figment of your feeble but often quite hilarious imagination. If you believe that what I posted is incorrect, then it is up to you as the prosecution to prove me wrong. For you to expect me to do the work for you only shows that you are no man, but a little boy who must post on the web to try and make himself feel important in the eyes of your peers here on this forum. Get up off your armchair, get in your car, and get down to the courthouse during normal business hours and search the records like I did several months ago for another reason. Then when you are done, you can post what you have found, and we'll all sit back and watch you fall flat on your face.


Mr Bill

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Mr. Bill,

It would appear that you still have not learned how to read for content. Please try this one more time and then explain in your own words what is meant by the following quote from myself:

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Quoting Myself from the previous posting:

"But just lets assume that RT did donate land to the Temples. I would say that the Township had no business doing that and probably violated the US constitution in doing so. The Government is not supposed to be providing financial support to religion in this country. Your tax dollars are NOT to be spent on religious orgainizations. If you are an advocate for that kind of theocratic system, please move to Iran."

----------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you not understand about that? Do I need to re-word it for you?

And lastly, I think that everyone wants to know your position on whether or not RT should be providing infrastructure and financial support to Christs Corporation.

You Dodged that question, now answer it. My position is crystal clear. Christs Coropration will be the downfall of RT as we know it and does not deserve one iota of support from its good taxpaying citizens.

What sayeth you, bud?

-------------------------------

ps - I have no intention of prosecuting you. Someone like yourself makes a nonsensical assertioin, it is then incumbant on that individual to prove same, not the other way around. That is how it works in the real world in which I live - - - the scientific world. In other words, any idiot can proclaim that the earth is a cube. Not every idiot can prove it. And that simple assertion does not make the earth a cube. And after such an assertion is made, the scientific community does not rush out to try to disprove the idiot, so it is on your shoulders, buddy. Now, get to work.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

Should Rockaway provide any support to a religious institution, absolutely not. Especially a FOR PROFIT religious institution like Christ Church.


There, now that we got that one out of the way, tell me when you plan to take that trip down to the courthouse so that we can see you take a step away from the computer and prove me right (or wrong for that matter)?


Mr Bill

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Mr Bill,

To answer your question once again, I will simply quote myself from above. You still seem to have a real big problem with reading comprehension:

------------------------------------------------------

Quoting myself:

"ps - I have no intention of prosecuting you. Someone like yourself makes a nonsensical assertioin, it is then incumbant on that individual to prove same, not the other way around. That is how it works in the real world in which I live - - - the scientific world. In other words, any idiot can proclaim that the earth is a cube. Not every idiot can prove it. And that simple assertion does not make the earth a cube. And after such an assertion is made, the scientific community does not rush out to try to disprove the idiot, so it is on your shoulders, buddy. Now, get to work."

------------------------------------------------------

There is your answer. Do not ask again. I do not enjoy chatting with idiots. As a matter of fact, this ends this vague attempt at a discussion.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

When you write "I do not enjoy chatting with idiots", keep looking at yourself in the mirror when you say that as you seem to be the only one who is upset by our conversation. Once more you delve into a discussion making general and quite vague yet pointed statements for purposes as yet unknown other to your own feeble mindset. When called on them as being wrong and incorrect, you resort to your quite common and boorish childlike statements in an attempt to garner some type of rise out of the responder. Well, at least in my case, that shall never be the case as I for one rarely take anything you say personally, or for that matter seriously. You went off the deep end long ago, and I can now see why your business is on the decline as well. Perhaps it's time for you to step away from the politics, keyboards, and get outside into the real world where the sun is still shining, instead of hunched over your computer screen as if it is the only source of your reality. Hide behind whatever excuses you like to make yourself feel important, but remember it will only be your undoing when reality comes to bite you in your behind.


Mr Bill

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Quoting Mr. Bill:

" - - - and I can now see why your business is on the decline as well."

---------------------------------------------------------

Where the hell did you get that idea from? Our software and engineering consulting businesses are growing like a weed! We sell into internatioinal markets and are the largest purveyor of DSP Audio Forensics Software in the world. Post 911, our business literally exploded and has grown exponentially each and every year ever since. If you want to see the extent of our product offering, check out our companies website at:

http://www.diamondcut.com

Now for the legal stuff. What you have stated is an unsubstantiated lie (read as Liable). I expect a retraction of your public statement here because there is not one iota of truth to it. This time, it is not just a little intellectual exercise, you either prove your statement that our business in on the decline or face the Diamond Cut Productions, Inc. attorneys.

You will put that retraction here on this venue within the next 48 hours, or you will have some legal hell to pay, bud.

Your statement above really proves that you are the village idiot. I will not discuss anything with you anymore except via my attorneys if you do not rectify your statement (or prove your statement to be correct - - - an impossible task since the statement is a lie)

Have a Nice Day

:)

ps - you may want to study this link - - - this "declining" company just introduced the product family shown on this link (last week) after over a year of engineering development:

http://diamondcut.com/Catalog/DC7Details.html

This week we will be rolling out the Forensics Version of this product update. Stay tuned!

Certainly, these things are not an indication of a company in decline! Besides all that, where the hell would you obtain financial information pertaing to a Privately held corportation like Diamond Cut? You have quite a problem on your hands. If you do not believe me, then I would suggest that you print out this thread and present it to your attorney and get some expert advice on how to minimize your liability.












-- Edited by Rational at 12:09, 2007-10-14

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

Care to take me to court over my opinion posted on this internet forum without actually naming your business, feel free to sic your attorneys on me post haste. In the end, you'll open up a can of worms far to large for even your wounded ego to endure. I'll await the sheriffs office at my door with open arms when your attorney signs the complaint. Don't be surprised when my attorney slaps a counter suit, as you sir clearly have far more to lose than I do. Your best bet is to print this out and show it to your attorney, as you are the one who is in the wrong with your internet threats, especially since you are an officer of the company in question. Oh, and before you decide to edit your post again, keep in mind that I have already printed out your posts, original and otherwise.

Mr Bill



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1663
Date:

Quoting Mr. Bill once again:

" - - - and I can now see why your business is on the decline as well."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You asked for it; hold on for one hell of a ride. Ya see, ya just can not make assertions like that without facts. You will learn.

Rat

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

I'm quaking in my sneakers.


Mr Bill

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 472
Date:

Okay you two. Stop it now, or I'll have you over my knee.

Seriously!

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 178
Date:

Karen,

Promises, promises. LOL!


Mr Bill

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 472
Date:

Hey, you know I'll do it! biggrin.gif

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 111
Date:

Hey Karen. Where can I sign up to be next over your knee? How have you been? C.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard